首页> 外文OA文献 >Aerobically Incubated Thioglycolate Broth Disk Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobes
【2h】

Aerobically Incubated Thioglycolate Broth Disk Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobes

机译:需氧培养的巯基乙酸盐肉汤法测定厌氧菌的药敏性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The anaerobic broth disk (AnBD) method of Wilkins and Thiel and a new modification, designated the thioglycolate broth disk method, were compared with an agar dilution technique. The thioglycolate broth disk method was incubated aerobically (AeTBD) or anaerobically (AnTBD). One hundred anaerobic bacteria representing 15 species were tested with clindamycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Agreement of results by the two methods with minimal inhibitory concentration determinations were: AnBD, 95.2%; AnTBD, 91.5%; AeTBD, 94.5%. With clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and penicillin, the agreement of the AeTBD and agar dilution results was 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. Using the AeTBD method, only 1.1% of all tests gave false susceptible readings, whereas 4.4% gave false resistant readings. All susceptibility testing errors occurred with tetracycline, erythromycin, and, to a lesser extent, penicillin. For each method, the changes in designation of bacteria as being susceptible or resistant to an antibiotic between trials primarily involved strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations which were ± one dilution of the respective breakpoint value. The same situation was true for most bacteria that yielded false resistant readings within each trial. False resistant readings with tetracycline were determined to be unrelated to excess cation content of test media. These results reaffirm the reliability of the AnBD method and indicate that the AeTBD modification is equally reliable. The greater convenience and lower cost of the AeTBD method should make possible more widespread performance of susceptibility testing for anaerobic bacteria in hospital laboratories.
机译:将Wilkins和Thiel的厌氧肉汤圆盘(AnBD)方法和一种新的命名为硫代乙醇酸肉汤圆盘方法与琼脂稀释技术进行了比较。硫代乙醇酸盐肉汤圆盘法需氧培养(AeTBD)或厌氧培养(AnTBD)。用克林霉素,氯霉素,红霉素,青霉素和四环素测试了代表15种细菌的一百个厌氧细菌。用最小抑制浓度测定的两种方法的结果一致:AnBD,95.2%;苯并二恶英,91.5%; AeTBD,94.5%。使用克林霉素,氯霉素和青霉素时,AeTBD和琼脂稀释结果的一致性分别为100%,100%和95%。使用AeTBD方法,在所有测试中只有1.1%给出了错误的易感读数,而4.4%给出了错误的抗性读数。所有药敏试验错误均发生在四环素,红霉素和少量的青霉素上。对于每种方法,试验之间细菌对抗生素敏感或耐药的名称变化主要涉及具有最小抑菌浓度的菌株,抑菌浓度为各个断点值的±一倍。对于在每次试验中产生假抗性读数的大多数细菌,情况也是如此。确定四环素具有抗假性的读数与测试培养基中过量的阳离子含量无关。这些结果重申了AnBD方法的可靠性,并表明AeTBD修改同样可靠。 AeTBD方法的更大便利性和更低的成本将使医院实验室中厌氧菌药敏试验的更广泛的性能成为可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号